2067 (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

40%

20672020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘2067’ can’t resist some on-trend eco-messaging and character diversity, but mostly sticks to classic underdog sci-fi. Its woke content is present but not overwhelming or preachy, nothing compared to the usual Hollywood sermonizing.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While '2067' features some diverse casting and environmental themes, character arcs and the plot largely focus on personal responsibility, sacrifice, and traditional sci-fi problem-solving. Identity is present but not overriding. There's no overt character selected just for demographic boxes, though moralizing moments pop up.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The film emphasizes saving humanity through science and environmental action, lightly critiquing present neglect. Family, loyalty, and perseverance are foregrounded. It lightly questions corporate/government authority, but broad attacks on religion or masculinity are mostly absent.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

There’s a clear environmental message and a warning about human hubris, yet there’s some room for challenging perspectives (skepticism about authority, self-sacrifice). Traditional cynics aren’t just cartoon bad guys, though dissent gets little airtime.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

12%

Movie poster for Reflections in the Dust

Movie poster for 2099: The Soldier Protocol

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.