A Fantastic Woman (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

95%

A Fantastic Woman2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

With a laser-like focus on identity politics, 'A Fantastic Woman' offers little space for alternative perspectives or traditional values. The film feels constructed around its message, leaving subtlety and pluralism on the cutting room floor. One of the wokest examples from recent years.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film's narrative centers explicitly on its transgender lead, with identity as the overwhelming focus. This approach appears to prioritize thematic messaging over multi-layered character development or narrative subtlety. Many traditional storytelling elements feel secondary to highlighting social issues.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional family norms and societal institutions are consistently portrayed as obstacles, if not outright antagonists, to the protagonist's self-actualization. The film regularly frames established morality and religious aspects as oppressive or outdated, aligning with modern ideological perspectives.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints are largely absent or depicted in an unsympathetic light. The film does not offer sincere engagement with dissenting or traditional perspectives, largely portraying them as bigoted or villainous, reinforcing a single ideological stance.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.