A Few Good Men (1992) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

A Few Good Men1992

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"A Few Good Men" is about as non-woke as you’ll find in Hollywood. It values character drama, real debate, and doesn’t shoehorn in current-year ideology. A refreshing throwback to when story came first.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"A Few Good Men" is mostly focused on tight storytelling, character-driven drama, and military procedure. Casting and character traits appear to serve the story rather than checking identity boxes. No obvious forced diversity or unrealistic character competence on display here; narrative comes first, just how it should be.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While the film scrutinizes military culture and questions authority, it largely respects themes of honor, sacrifice, and tradition. Masculinity, leadership, and family aren’t pathologized, if anything, they’re seriously examined. There’s little modern revisionism or mockery of traditional values at play.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film actually offers a plurality of viewpoints. Both the prosecution and defense get fair treatment, and the military code is seriously debated rather than lampooned. There’s no obvious sneering at alternative viewpoints; traditional, even harsh ideas get their day in court, literally.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

23%

12%

12%

Movie poster for When Harry Met Sally...

18%

15%

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.