A King in New York (1957) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

18%

A King in New York1957

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Despite its critical tone, 'A King in New York' is far from what we’d call woke by modern standards. Its satire is more about freedom than identity politics. Watching it today almost feels refreshing next to recent Hollywood output.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film prioritizes its satirical story and character development over identity politics or diversity checkboxes. Casting and characterization appear grounded in the narrative rather than modern ideological choices. There's no evidence of forced representation or identity-driven writing common in more contemporary “woke” cinema.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the film does offer a sharp critique of American society and McCarthy-era hysteria, it doesn’t undermine core traditions such as family, religion, or masculinity in the ways seen in recent “woke” productions. Most cultural commentary is aimed at political paranoia over foundational institutions.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Chaplin’s satire is pointed, but dissenting social and political views are explored with nuance and real debate, rather than through caricature. The film critiques censorship and conformity but doesn’t present a one-sided ideological monoculture by today’s standards.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for It's Great to be Young!

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.