A Long Way Down (2014) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

A Long Way Down2014

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A Long Way Down is refreshingly non-woke by current Hollywood standards. The film chooses authentic storytelling over ideological grandstanding, focusing on flawed, relatable characters rather than ticking diversity boxes or rewriting cultural norms. Safe watch for non-woke audiences.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film focuses on character development and personal struggles rather than overt identity politics. Character arcs are rooted in personal growth and relationships, not box-checking for representation. Casting and story decisions appear more driven by narrative needs than modern ideological trends.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While the film touches on themes like family and redemption, it doesn't aggressively undermine tradition, religion, or masculinity. The story acknowledges problems but stops well short of mocking foundational values. If anything, it leans on vulnerability and connection across experiences.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Though it showcases characters with different backgrounds, it doesn't villainize traditional perspectives. Alternative views are present and treated with some nuance. The film avoids the heavy-handed messaging commonly found in more recent releases.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Men Who Stare at Goats

15%

12%

10%

25%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.