Ad Vitam (2025) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

86%

Ad Vitam2025

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Ad Vitam exemplifies the modern woke science fiction mold, prioritizing identity politics and cultural deconstruction over nuanced storytelling. It leaves little space for non-woke perspectives, making it a textbook example of the current ideological monoculture trend in cinema.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Ad Vitam places a heavy emphasis on identity dynamics and generational conflict. Some characters feel selected and written mainly for their symbolic identity value rather than deeper characterization or narrative coherence. At times, identity factors are more visible than skill or personality, which can pull viewers out of the story.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film frequently questions traditional ideas about family, aging, and mortality, painting classic pillars of society as outmoded. Masculinity and established hierarchies are often critiqued or subverted, with new-age values positioned as inherently superior to what came before.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews are typically sidelined or associated with out-of-touch authority figures. There is little true debate, with the ‘progressive’ viewpoint overwhelmingly dominant and those questioning it depicted as archaic or unsympathetic, leading to a lack of real ideological diversity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Land of Blood and Wisdom

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.