After Sex (2007) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

80%

After Sex2007

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘After Sex’ wears its progressive themes proudly, prioritizing identity exploration over sturdy storytelling. Traditional values are more or less left in the dust, and there’s not much room for debate, expect a heavy dose of Hollywood groupthink here.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The film focuses heavily on sexual identity and relationship diversity, sometimes at the expense of deeper character development or believable story arcs. While not entirely lacking in nuance, many conversations feel designed more to check boxes than push genuine storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional relationships and values are often sidelined in favor of exploring progressive attitudes towards sexuality, detaching the narrative from cultural norms surrounding family and morality. Masculinity, femininity, and religion are not overtly mocked, but traditional views are mostly absent or cast as outdated.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews, especially more traditional perspectives, are largely missing or treated with skepticism. The film tends to center modern attitudes and offers little sincere debate or pluralism, keeping the tone ideologically consistent and quite ‘woke.’

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

12%

Decoding Deepak

Movie poster for How to Follow Strangers

Movie poster for Happy Birthday Harris Malden

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.