Amityville 3-D (1983) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Amityville 3-D1983

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Amityville 3-D is blissfully free of modern wokeness. Its scares are of the supernatural variety, not the sociopolitical. If you want pure 80s pulp horror without lectures, you're safe here.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Amityville 3-D sticks firmly to its haunted house tropes and doesn't veer off into identity-driven subplots or obvious ideological signaling. Characters are defined by plot relevance, not modern identity politics. It's more concerned with ghostly chills than diversity checklists.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn't engage in commentary about family, religion, or gender roles. Traditional dynamics are present, if a bit bland, and there's no attempt to overturn or mock classic values. Horror is the only real focus, not cultural subversion.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's no hint of ideological preaching here, no ideological homogeneity, nor any caricature of traditional perspectives. Villains are ghosts, not representatives of some disfavored worldview. If there's any message, it's simply 'avoid haunted houses.'

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Amityville: The Evil Escapes

Movie poster for Amityville 1992: It's About Time

Movie poster for Amityville: A New Generation

Movie poster for Amityville II: The Possession

Movie poster for Amityville: The Awakening

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.