An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

81%

An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

This sequel to An Inconvenient Truth doubles down on activist messaging, sacrificing diversity of thought and some narrative integrity in its push for climate action. Alternative perspectives need not apply.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film places activism and its ideological lens at the forefront, often prioritizing messaging over narrative tension or balanced character exploration. It leans heavily on Al Gore’s perspective, which can seem more like advocacy than storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Traditional values such as rural livelihoods, certain economic practices, and aspects of Western modernity are depicted as environmentally suspect or regressive. Religion or alternative moral perspectives on environment are largely ignored.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film offers scant room for dissenting opinions, presenting a singular worldview where alternative takes on climate change policy or skepticism are marginalized or depicted negatively, if at all.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

85%

Movie poster for Casino Jack and the United States of Money

Movie poster for Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey

92%

Movie poster for 3 ½ Minutes, 10 Bullets

25%

Movie poster for John Lewis: Good Trouble

82%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.