Animal Kingdom (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Animal Kingdom2010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Animal Kingdom is a refreshingly non-woke film. Its focus on crime, psychology, and raw family tension means it dodges the hallmarks of modern identity-driven storytelling. If you're looking to escape the usual Hollywood trends, this one's safe.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Animal Kingdom is firmly grounded in gritty realism, focusing on individual psychology and family dynamics rather than shoehorning in identity politics. Characters are developed based on their motivations and roles within the crime family, not on modern ideological checklists.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film portrays family, dysfunctional though it is, as central. Traditional masculinity is neither mocked nor artificially glorified; rather, it's just depicted as a dangerous force in this criminal world. There's no attempt to revise cultural or historical foundations to fit modern trends.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Different worldviews emerge naturally among characters. Authority, crime, and family are portrayed through nuanced lenses, not filtered through a one-note ideological agenda. There is no clear villainization of traditional perspectives or cartoonish portrayal of alternative views.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

Movie poster for Darwin's Brave New World

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.