Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters (2007) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters2007

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters is about as non-woke as it gets, complete chaos, irreverence, and zero ideological messaging. If you’re worried about being preached to or force-fed modern identity politics, you can safely watch this and scratch your head in peace.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film is intentionally nonsensical, prioritizing absurdist humor over any form of ideology or identity-driven casting. Characters are bizarre and illogical, and there's no sense that creators are sacrificing narrative integrity for modern ideological trends.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values and institutions aren't really a target in this film. If anything, mockery is directed everywhere equally, and none of it is framed through a modern ideological lens. Religion, family, and masculinity are just more absurdist fodder.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's no clear ideology promoted here, let alone an echo chamber. The film is too chaotic and irreverent to promote any cohesive worldview, progressive or otherwise.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Aqua Teen Forever: Plantasm

Movie poster for Harvey Birdman, Attorney at Law

13%

15%

Movie poster for Scott Pilgrim vs. the Animation

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.