Back to the Future Part II (1989) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Back to the Future Part II1989

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Back to the Future Part II is virtually untouched by modern Hollywood wokeness, offering traditional storytelling and value-neutral depictions. It feels like a breath of fresh air in comparison to more recent, agenda-heavy films.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Back to the Future Part II focuses on time travel, fun sci-fi antics, and character-driven storytelling. Casting choices and character arcs are rooted in narrative needs, with no noticeable prioritization of identity politics over plot or merit.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional themes, such as family, personal responsibility, and ambition, are front and center. Masculinity, family, and morality are treated in a straightforward, classic manner, without revisionist takes or subversion of heritage or traditional values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's no sense of ideological monoculture; the film avoids socio-political preaching and embraces a pluralistic, open tone. Multiple viewpoints, ambition, caution, ethical choices, are explored through its characters, with no group treated as a one-dimensional villain or caricature.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Back to the Future Part III

Movie poster for E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial

Movie poster for Home Alone 2: Lost in New York

13%

Movie poster for Ferris Bueller's Day Off

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.