Batman: Assault on Arkham (2014) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

13%

Batman: Assault on Arkham2014

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Batman: Assault on Arkham plays it straight, sticking to established DC characterizations without jumping on the modern 'woke' bandwagon. Classic in style, light on virtue signaling.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film focuses on action, ensemble dynamics, and crime drama rather than pushing identity politics. Characters are depicted according to established canon, without obvious prioritization of race, gender, or sexuality over storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional archetypes like masculinity, family, and even morality are presented in the familiar Batman style. While anti-hero themes are present, the film doesn't undermine classic values or engage in cultural revisionism.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's room for a range of moral and personal viewpoints among the Suicide Squad members. The film doesn't mock or villainize dissenting perspectives, keeping things focused on the story’s heist and crime elements.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Tom and Jerry Blast Off to Mars!

Movie poster for Tom and Jerry: The Fast and the Furry

10%

Movie poster for Batman: Black and White Motion Comics

Movie poster for Tom and Jerry's Giant Adventure

Movie poster for Tom and Jerry: The Lost Dragon

Movie poster for Justice League: Throne of Atlantis

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.