Boys on the Side (1995) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

70%

Boys on the Side1995

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Boys on the Side" leans into mid-90s social commentary, offering early examples of representation but sometimes sacrificing narrative depth for ideological messaging. While not the wokest film by today’s standards, it’s definitely ahead of its time in prioritizing progressive values.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While "Boys on the Side" features well-drawn characters, the narrative at times appears to prioritize social issues, such as sexuality and AIDS, over organic storytelling. Some characters are defined mainly by their identities, and certain events serve to underscore messages rather than evolve naturally from character or plot.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The film challenges traditional views on sexuality and family, highlighting non-traditional relationships and offering a critical lens on masculinity. At points, it seems to depict alternative lifestyles as inherently preferable or more virtuous than conventional norms.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

While not as overt as modern films, dissenting views or traditional perspectives are limited. Conservative values are presented mainly as obstacles or sources of conflict, lacking nuanced representation. Alternative viewpoints receive little substantive engagement.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

12%

12%

Movie poster for Looney Tunes: Back in Action

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.