Breaking (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

68%

Breaking2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“Breaking” toes the line between powerful storytelling and a socially conscious agenda, putting systemic critique front and center. While rooted in true events, it leans noticeably into woke territory, but not to the cartoonish extremes seen elsewhere.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The film is based on a true story and centers its themes on social issues like racial injustice and veteran treatment. Some viewers might feel identity factors are emphasized over deeper character exploration, but the narrative still draws from real-life context, which keeps it grounded in merit rather than simply ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

While "Breaking" highlights systemic issues and critiques institutions, it generally does so without portraying traditional values or family as inherently backwards. Masculine characters are allowed vulnerability without being outright mocked, but the heavy focus on societal flaws edges it upward on the woke scale.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews, such as more traditional takes on authority or America’s institutions, are largely absent, as the film leans heavily into the perspective of systemic failure. Authority figures mostly serve as obstacles, and dissenting views receive minimal development or sympathy.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Every Time a Bell Rings

75%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.