Critters (1986) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Critters1986

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Critters is gloriously non-woke, focusing on fun mayhem instead of modern ideological checklists. It’s a creature feature throwback where diversity means getting eaten in new ways, not identity-driven heroics.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Critters is an unapologetically straightforward creature feature. Characters are cast for their fit in the campy story, not their identity checkboxes. No one is given the modern 'flawless hero' treatment, if anything, everyone is fair game for monster mayhem. Identity politics are gloriously absent.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film maintains a traditional view on family and heroism, even poking fun at itself without undercutting masculinity, religion, or culture. There’s no modern reinterpretation of gender or social values, just good old small-town terror and teamwork.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Any ideological uniformity here has more to do with everyone being scared of space porcupines than subscribing to the same modern moral -isms. No ideological lectures, just townsfolk versus aliens. If anything, it’s refreshingly pluralistic in its indifference to all that.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master

30%

35%

Movie poster for A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge

Movie poster for National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.