Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon2000

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is refreshingly non-woke by current Hollywood standards. It prioritizes story and character over modern identity politics, and treats its cultural foundations with respect and nuance.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film emphasizes rich character development within the context of Wuxia tradition, with motivations and growth stemming from personal choices and cultural heritage, not modern identity checklists. Female characters are strong, but their depth fits the story's internal logic, not forced quotas.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values, honor, discipline, family, morality, are central and taken seriously. While the film allows some challenge to gender norms, it does so in a way that feels natural within the story’s world, not like a modern rebuke of tradition.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film explores diverse perspectives among its characters, showcasing tensions between tradition, duty, and freedom. No caricatures; alternative views get genuine, respectful treatment. It avoids the kind of modern ideological browbeating seen in recent films.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for House of Flying Daggers

Movie poster for The Children of Huang Shi

13%

Movie poster for Riding Alone for Thousands of Miles

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.