Cruel Intentions 3 (2004) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

Cruel Intentions 32004

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Cruel Intentions 3 is much more about old-fashioned, over-the-top melodrama than promoting any modern 'woke' agenda. It’s self-indulgent and nihilistic but refreshingly free of heavy ideological messaging or forced diversity.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Cruel Intentions 3 doesn't prioritize modern identity politics or forced representation. Characters are developed along traditional lines, manipulation, seduction, and comeuppance are more important than checking diversity boxes. The story sticks with well-worn melodrama over ideological messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

This film is less about undermining cultural foundations and more about scandal and personal games. It doesn’t really attack traditional family, masculinity, or religion; instead, it seems content just wallowing in its own indulgent drama without a culture war axe to grind.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the film pushes a very cynical, amoral worldview (as does the series in general), it doesn’t preach modern ideological uniformity. If anything, everyone is out for themselves, which means no heavy-handed 'woke' consensus or villains purely based on traditional views.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

18%

10%

12%

Movie poster for The Lady from Shanghai: A Discussion with Peter Bogdanovich

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.