Diabolique (1996) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Diabolique1996

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Diabolique (1996) is mostly free of the kind of woke elements we see in modern Hollywood. It prioritizes story over message, employs genre-driven character roles, and keeps cultural subversion to a minimum. Pretty non-woke by today’s standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Diabolique (1996) is largely focused on suspense and interpersonal drama rather than heavy-handed messaging. Its casting and character motivations center more on fitting the thriller narrative than ticking modern identity boxes. Any choices on identity seem rooted in plot requirements, not ideological force.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While the film features strong female leads, it doesn’t blatantly undermine traditional family, faith, or masculinity. The gender dynamic is classic for the noir/thriller genre rather than a soapbox for social messaging. Tension is driven by plot, not an agenda to rewrite cultural norms.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints are part of the genre’s natural suspicion and deceit, not deliberately vilified. It doesn’t go out of its way to ridicule or exclude traditional views, nor does it enforce a unified modern ideology.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

15%

Movie poster for Memoirs of an Invisible Man

Movie poster for Under Siege 2: Dark Territory

10%

18%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.