District 13: Ultimatum (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

District 13: Ultimatum2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

District 13: Ultimatum is refreshingly non-woke, focusing on action, gritty realism, and old-school themes like loyalty and resistance without the heavy hand of modern identity politics. A blast from a less ideologically charged past.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

District 13: Ultimatum largely sticks to action and urban drama without forcing identity politics. Characters are cast for believability within the gritty, parkour-heavy universe, with plot and skills driving their roles. There's little evidence of ideology overriding narrative integrity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional themes like family and loyalty are central, and masculinity isn't mocked but rather celebrated through the leads. The depiction of authority may be cynical, but it’s more anti-corruption than overt cultural revisionism or value inversion.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the film is critical of government corruption, dissent is displayed by both sides, and there's a mix of perspectives from different backgrounds. No group is demonized solely for being traditional; complexity and moral conflict are present.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

12%

12%

Movie poster for A Few Days in September

Movie poster for Crimson Rivers II: Angels of the Apocalypse

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.