Doctor Who: The End of Time Part 2 (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

Doctor Who: The End of Time Part 22010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A fitting send-off for David Tennant’s Doctor, "The End of Time Part 2" feels refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards, preferring drama and legacy over identity politics or forced messages. Classic sci-fi with a soft spot for old-school values.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"The End of Time Part 2" largely keeps its focus on established characters and their relationships, with storylines driven by legacy, sacrifice, and redemption. There’s no noticeable effort to shoehorn in ideology at the expense of narrative, and character traits are rooted in prior canon, not identity checklists.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Traditional values around loyalty, self-sacrifice, and legacy are front and center. Masculinity through the Doctor and Wilf is depicted as noble, if bittersweet. There’s no real undercutting of religion, family, or longstanding cultural touchstones. This is a rare nostalgia-heavy outing for modern TV.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While the Doctor’s worldview tends toward a pretty generic humanism, it doesn’t overtly dismiss dissenting perspectives. Alternative views aren’t demonized; they're just not the focus. No heavy-handed monoculture here, debate is more philosophical than ideological.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

30%

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.