Dog Day Afternoon (1975) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

18%

Dog Day Afternoon1975

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Dog Day Afternoon is a time capsule from a less ideological era. While it touches on controversial issues, it does so with nuance and complexity, without the hallmarks of modern “woke” filmmaking. Low on the woke meter.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film’s character-driven story is rooted firmly in realism, with a strong focus on flawed, believable people. Issues of gender and sexuality do arise, but they serve the plot and character development rather than feeling like a vehicle for modern identity politics. No evidence of forced representation or flawless, untouchable characters here.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

There is some exploration of topics like sexuality and unconventional relationships, but traditional American values and institutions are neither openly mocked nor heavily undermined. The film’s approach is more observational than preachy, reflecting social tensions of the time without rewriting cultural history.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the film challenges norms, it presents multiple perspectives, cops, criminals, onlookers, and avoids cartoonish villains or entirely one-sided moral takes. It doesn’t hammer home a uniform worldview, and alternative positions are depicted with nuance.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

Movie poster for National Lampoon's Vacation

12%

Movie poster for Once Upon a Time in America

27%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.