Earth vs. the Flying Saucers (1956) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Earth vs. the Flying Saucers1956

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A refreshingly non-woke relic, Earth vs. the Flying Saucers puts story and spectacle first, free from modern ideological baggage. Safe territory for those who miss the era before Hollywood 'discovered' diversity checklists.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Earth vs. the Flying Saucers is a product of the 1950s sci-fi era, and it doesn't showcase forced representation or prioritize characters' identities over skills or personalities. The story sticks to classic genre conventions, with plot and character choices rooted in narrative needs rather than ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film maintains traditional portrayals of family, gender roles, and patriotism. There’s no attempt to undermine religion, masculinity, or American values. The protagonist’s masculine competence and straightforward morality reflect the era’s norms.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While perspectives outside the mainstream 1950s worldview aren't showcased, there’s no overt villainization of traditional views nor are dissenting opinions caricatured. The lack of pluralism simply reflects the time.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The 7th Voyage of Sinbad

Movie poster for Have Rocket, Will Travel

Movie poster for It Came from Beneath the Sea

Movie poster for Creature with the Atom Brain

Movie poster for The Night the World Exploded

Movie poster for Fortunes of Captain Blood

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.