Exodus: Gods and Kings (2014) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

Exodus: Gods and Kings2014

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Exodus: Gods and Kings largely avoids the modern 'woke' template, sticking to old-school storytelling and traditional themes. While not perfect, it’s a breath of non-woke air by today's standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film takes a largely traditional approach, sticking to the biblical narrative of Moses. Casting decisions drew controversy for lacking ethnic accuracy, but there were no obvious signs of identity-driven character creation or flawless diverse characters. The focus remains on classic storytelling rather than modern ideological overlays.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While some creative liberties are taken, core elements of religion, masculinity, and family are respected, not undermined. Critiques focused more on historical accuracy than attacks on traditional values. Masculinity and faith retain prominent roles, without significant mockery or inversion.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

There’s little evidence of a modern ideological monoculture. The film’s world reflects a time of strong religious belief. Some modern perspectives are absent, but this fits the genre rather than signaling forced conformity to ideology. Dissident or alternative worldviews are not the main target of ridicule.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Kid Who Would Be King

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.