Fistful of Vengeance (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

62%

Fistful of Vengeance2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Fistful of Vengeance' flirts with woke trends in casting and outlook, but doesn’t entirely sacrifice old-school action fun. Ideological elements are present, yet not as dominant as many contemporary Hollywood releases.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While 'Fistful of Vengeance' centers on action and martial arts, it appears to lean into modern identity themes, especially in its diverse casting. However, most characters still have distinct personalities and skills relevant to the story, which keeps the narrative from feeling completely overwhelmed by ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t explicitly attack tradition, family, or masculinity, but it does highlight contemporary views while glossing over deeper cultural roots or morality. Male leads are allowed some traditional strength, though the presentation is more style than substance.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

There’s a strong sense of modern consensus around identity and morality among the protagonists, with little voice given to alternative views. Traditional frameworks and deeper internal debates are mostly sidelined in favor of standard action-genre banter.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Tremors: Shrieker Island

Movie poster for The Man with the Iron Fists 2

10%

Movie poster for Lost Treasure of Jesse James

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.