Fitzcarraldo (1982) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Fitzcarraldo1982

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Fitzcarraldo is an almost entirely non-woke film. Characters are real and conflicted, historical context trumps political messaging, and viewers are left to wrestle with moral complexities rather than receive a postmodern lecture.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Fitzcarraldo is driven by character ambition, risk, and obsession, not by identity politics. Casting and character arcs are built around the era's social realities without shoehorning diversity for its own sake. There’s no forced representation or hyper-powered virtue-signaling hero, just a flawed dreamer against nature and circumstance.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional gender roles, religion, and colonial-era attitudes are presented as they would have been in the story’s time, for better or worse. The film doesn’t lecture or rewrite cultural history to fit modern ideological goals.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews and the tension between indigenous culture and Western ambition are depicted with a degree of nuance. The narrative allows viewers to find both fault and fascination in various perspectives, without caricaturing any particular group.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

30%

Movie poster for Mother Küsters Goes to Heaven

Movie poster for The Last Years of Childhood

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.