Franklyn (2008) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Franklyn2008

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Franklyn is a rare example of a modern film that doesn’t indulge in heavy-handed ideological messaging or the usual Hollywood identity focus. It explores complex individual crises and faith with sincerity, avoiding the pitfalls of today’s ‘woke’ trends.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Franklyn's narrative focuses on psychological depth, faith, and intersecting destinies, rather than pushing identity themes or forced representation. Characters are developed based on their personal struggles and beliefs rather than identity checkboxes. No evidence suggests that core character traits are overshadowed by ideological priorities.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional beliefs, religion, and themes of family are explored thoughtfully. The film's speculative elements question faith but don't mock or undermine traditional values in a modern ideological way. There’s no aggressive subversion of masculinity or cultural revisionism present throughout the story.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Franklyn presents pluralistic viewpoints, particularly about faith and psychology, without presenting any single ideology as superior. Dissenting or alternative worldviews aren't stereotyped or villainized, allowing for genuine character complexity and debate within the narrative.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

13%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.