Freedomland (2006) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

75%

Freedomland2006

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Freedomland' checks many of the usual 'woke' boxes: identity-driven storytelling, critical depictions of tradition, and an obvious tilt towards one worldview. While not the most extreme example, it’s a clear entry in the genre of agenda-heavy social drama.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The film leans heavily into social commentary about race and police, occasionally sidelining authentic plot development and nuance for messaging. Characters' identities often drive the drama more than their individual personalities or growth. This may come across as sacrificing narrative depth for ideological focus.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

'Freedomland' depicts institutions like the police and traditional community structures in a negative light, amplifying narratives of systemic failure. While it explores real issues, the story often undermines pillars like law enforcement and family by portraying them as untrustworthy or broken.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film pushes one side of the argument, with alternative perspectives generally overshadowed or dismissed as antagonistic. There’s little room for debate; traditional voices tend to be portrayed as insensitive or incompetent, reinforcing a singular ideological viewpoint.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

18%

10%

34%

15%

Movie poster for xXx: State of the Union

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.