Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel plays it straight, no woke preaching, no ideological box-checking, just three guys navigating mayhem in a British pub. It's refreshingly non-woke entertainment rooted in humor, storytelling, and classic sci-fi fun.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film centers on three average guys who stumble into a time travel adventure. Character choices and casting feel organic rather than ideologically driven, with no signs of forced diversity or identity politics overshadowing the plot. The story prioritizes humor and classic sci-fi elements.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional gender roles and cultural values aren’t directly challenged, mocked, or subverted. Masculinity and friendship are central, and there’s no discernible agenda to rewrite history or attack longstanding traditions. The film leans on British pub culture, keeping things grounded and familiar.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is little evidence of ideological preaching; the tone is light and irreverent, poking fun at genre tropes rather than pushing a modern social message. Characters have distinct personalities and worldviews, with no monolithic moral outlook imposed.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

63%

22%

Movie poster for The Men Who Stare at Goats

15%

32%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.