Gantz (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Gantz2010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Gantz is about as non-woke as it gets these days. It sticks to its gritty sci-fi source material without inserting modern ideological talking points, offering engaging action and character conflict over identity themes.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Gantz focuses mainly on high-stakes action, existential dilemmas, and personal growth rather than emphasizing identity politics. Casting aligns with manga source material and does not appear to force diversity or prioritize ideology over story and character realism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional Japanese social values, friendships, and moral ambiguity are central. While the film questions aspects of authority and morality, it does not attack or ridicule religion, family, or masculinity in a 'woke' fashion. Gender roles are mostly traditional and not subverted.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is no noticeable ideological monoculture. Characters have diverse motivations and flaws, and no one worldview is presented as inherently superior. Dissent and personal conflict are significant, not caricatured or mocked overtly.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

Movie poster for Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods

Movie poster for Lupin the Third: Green vs Red

Movie poster for Lupin the Third: Blood Seal of the Eternal Mermaid

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.