Giant Little Ones (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

85%

Giant Little Ones2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Giant Little Ones leans hard into modern ideological territory, with its focus on sexuality and identity shaping both the story and its perspectives. While offering some fresh takes for certain audiences, it sacrifices narrative universality and pluralism along the way. Very much a product of the current woke era in filmmaking.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film puts significant emphasis on the exploration of sexual identity and modern views of gender among teens, arguably at the expense of more nuanced character depth or universally relatable coming-of-age struggles. Character arcs seem crafted primarily to serve topical ideological themes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional values such as family, masculinity, and sexuality are depicted in ways that challenge conventional norms. The story notably reinterprets familiar coming-of-age experiences through a lens that some viewers may feel subverts longstanding cultural assumptions.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The narrative heavily centers on affirming progressive views on sexuality and identity. Dissenting or traditional perspectives are mostly absent, marginalized, or treated as sources of conflict, leaving little space for genuine pluralism or debate.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Don't Get Killed In Alaska

80%

95%

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.