Green Street Hooligans 2 (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Green Street Hooligans 22009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Green Street Hooligans 2 is largely free of modern woke influence, focused more on gritty storytelling and traditional depictions of masculine conflict than contemporary ideological box-checking.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Green Street Hooligans 2 mostly maintains narrative focus, emphasizing football rivalries and prison survival over ideological messaging. Characters are portrayed according to the rough reality of the subject matter, with little emphasis on forced diversity or modern ideology at the expense of story or realism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The movie sticks closely to themes of masculinity, loyalty, and brotherhood, though it certainly doesn't idealize these elements. There's little in the way of subverting tradition or attacking family, religion, or traditional values; if anything, it showcases old-school (if problematic) codes of conduct.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t promote a specific modern ideology and avoids heavy-handed messaging. While it doesn’t spend much time offering counterpoints or deeper social discussions, it isn’t preoccupied with mocking traditional values or shaming dissenting perspectives.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Green Street 3: Never Back Down

Movie poster for Undead or Alive: A Zombedy

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.