Hatari! (1962) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Hatari!1962

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A non-woke relic from Hollywood’s golden years. Hatari! focuses on fun, adventure, and competence rather than modern identity themes. It’s a straightforward film that would likely give today’s sensitivity readers a heart attack, not that that’s a bad thing.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Hatari! is a classic adventure film that centers on skillful animal wranglers in Africa. The story is driven by character personalities, action, and camaraderie rather than identity politics. There's little to no sign of forced representation or modern ideological interference, a breath of fresh air by today's standards.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film upholds traditional gender roles and masculine heroism, reflecting cultural norms of its era. There's no obvious attempt to undermine religion, family, or masculinity, and it generally portrays these values positively or neutrally. Any role reversals are played for light humor, not as statements.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Hatari! steers clear of overt ideological preaching. Diverse perspectives are mostly within the realm of playful banter, and the absence of modern moral lectures or villainization of tradition is notable. Its worldview is straightforward, with characters fitting classic archetypes without subtextual politics.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Delicate Delinquent

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.