I Spit on Your Grave III: Vengeance Is Mine (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

81%

I Spit on Your Grave III: Vengeance Is Mine2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"I Spit on Your Grave III" aligns itself quite firmly with modern ideological tropes, sacrificing depth for blunt messaging. Its one-note depiction of trauma, masculinity, and justice pushes it deep into overtly woke territory.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

This film strongly centers its narrative on feminist revenge, with the protagonist’s trauma and empowerment taking precedence over nuanced storytelling or character depth. The plot leans heavily into ideology, emphasizing gendered victimization and retribution over realism or complex character arcs.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional masculinity is presented mostly in a negative light, often through the depiction of men as abusers or enablers. Family, religion, and broader moral nuance are largely absent, replaced by a stark focus on vengeance and victimization, which could be seen as undermining cultural foundations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

The film portrays alternative views, such as forgiveness or traditional justice, as inadequate or naive. Most male characters are portrayed unsympathetically, and the themes leave little room for viewpoint diversity or complexity, leaning into a contemporary ideological stance throughout.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

55%

13%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.