If These Walls Could Talk 2 (2000) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

91%

If These Walls Could Talk 22000

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

If These Walls Could Talk 2 is a poster child for early 2000s ‘woke’ filmmaking, placing identity-driven narratives and ideological messaging squarely ahead of nuanced exploration. Fans of more traditional storytelling or values will find little comfort here. Proceed with caution.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film centers its narrative explicitly on lesbian relationships across three time periods, often highlighting sexuality and gender identity as primary character traits. While it tries to depict personal stories, in our view, ideology frequently takes precedence over traditional character arcs or broader universal themes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

In our interpretation, the film subverts traditional notions of family and marriage, with religious or conventional moral frameworks typically sidelined or portrayed as repressive. Masculinity and traditional values are rarely offered sympathetic representation, reinforcing the view of foundational structures as obstacles.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or traditional perspectives are largely absent or depicted as hostile antagonists. The film heavily favors one worldview, with little room for genuine internal conflict or pluralism. Alternative voices tend to serve mainly as plot obstacles rather than as rounded characters.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for If These Walls Could Talk

30%

50%

12%

58%

Movie poster for Indictment: The McMartin Trial

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.