Ikiru (1952) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Ikiru1952

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Ikiru" is refreshingly non-woke by modern standards. It offers timeless existential themes, focuses on personal and societal responsibility, and doesn’t try to retrofit identity politics into its narrative. A classic that respects both its subject and its audience.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"Ikiru" tells a deeply human story focused on personal redemption and meaning, without emphasizing identity politics or sacrificing narrative for ideology. Characters are developed based on their roles and individual struggles, not their group identity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film respectfully explores themes of family, duty, and mortality in a Japanese cultural context. Traditional values and existential questions are front and center, with no agenda to undermine religion, masculinity, or family; if anything, the film mourns their erosion.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints are present through supporting characters, and there is sincere debate about the meaning of legacy and the role of bureaucracy. The film does not villainize traditionalism or dissent; rather, it offers a nuanced take on existential challenges.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Samurai II: Duel at Ichijoji Temple

Movie poster for The Men Who Tread on the Tiger's Tail

Movie poster for The Blue Mountains: Part I

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.