Infernal Affairs II (2003) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Infernal Affairs II2003

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Infernal Affairs II is refreshingly non-woke, centering traditional values and complex character development. It steers clear of identity-driven storytelling and ideological lecturing, making it a solid pick for viewers tired of Hollywood’s recent trends.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Infernal Affairs II focuses on intricate character drama, loyalty, and moral ambiguity without prioritizing identity politics or sacrificing story for ideological messaging. Characters are fleshed out based on their roles, not their demographic traits. The casting and narrative choices seem rooted in realism and merit.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional notions of family, duty, masculinity, and morality are central themes, presented with complexity but not mocked or dismissed. The film reflects traditional values and avoids undermining cultural or familial foundations, instead exploring their nuances in a Hong Kong context.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While the film focuses on crime and ethical gray areas, it doesn’t engage in modern ideological messaging or villainize traditional perspectives. Characters represent a range of moral positions, with no clear championing of any singular worldview or demonization of others.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

17%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.