Inspector Gadget 2 (2003) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Inspector Gadget 22003

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Inspector Gadget 2 is about as non-woke as they come. It sticks to classic comedic tropes, leaves current culture wars untouched, and makes no grand statements. Pure fluff, no activism here.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Inspector Gadget 2 focuses on classic slapstick and simple good-versus-evil storytelling. Character identities such as race or gender aren't central, nor are diverse traits highlighted beyond the source material. If anything, it's formulaic but not ideological.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional family themes and comic takes on masculinity abound, with no attempts to rewrite gender roles or tear down familial or religious values. Everything plays it extremely safe, sticking closely to straightforward, lighthearted entertainment.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s little to no ideological messaging, modern moralizing, or obvious mocking of traditional perspectives. It's as ideologically bland as it gets, and certainly not in a way that’s pushing any progressive envelope.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Movie poster for Mary-Kate and Ashley in Action

Movie poster for The Wacky World of Tex Avery

Movie poster for Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves

Movie poster for Gadget & the Gadgetinis

Movie poster for Inspector Gadget's Last Case

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.