Jumanji: The Next Level (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

23%

Jumanji: The Next Level2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Jumanji: The Next Level" manages to dodge most of the usual woke tripwires. Its diversity feels organic, and it focuses on fun, relatable teamwork over buzzword-laden sermons. If you're looking for a non-woke popcorn flick, this is about as safe as modern Hollywood gets.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the cast is notably diverse, the identity of the characters does not seem forced or primarily used to push an overt agenda. The story mostly focuses on adventure, humor, and personal growth, with representation fitting the light, fun premise rather than feeling shoehorned.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Traditional family values and friendships remain at the heart of the film. Masculinity and femininity are not derided, and the humor around body-swapping doesn't come across as derisive toward gender roles. Religion and longstanding American values are not really present or targeted for criticism.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

There isn’t much ideological heavy-handedness. The film sticks to safe, mainstream comedy, with little evidence of traditional perspectives being villainized or modern viewpoints being treated as gospel. Any commentary is mild and used for humor rather than indoctrination.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle

38%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.