Lady and the Tramp (2019) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

70%

Lady and the Tramp2019

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The 2019 "Lady and the Tramp" modernizes its classic formula with diverse casting and mild value updates. It's certainly more woke than its predecessor, but doesn't reach maximal levels of woke excess. A gentler kind of revision, but unmistakably on-trend with current Hollywood norms.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The 2019 remake appears to prioritize identity-based casting, with significant attention on diversifying historically white characters, which some viewers may see as coming at the cost of narrative authenticity or period realism. However, the film mostly follows the original story and character arcs without major ideological overhauls.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Traditional family themes and a wholesome, romantic narrative remain present, but there are subtle tweaks to gender roles and a clear effort to modernize certain values, which could be seen as a gentle nudge toward current ideological sensibilities rather than outright undermining.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews aren't strongly villainized, but the film steers into contemporary assumptions (especially on race and gender) with little debate. Traditional perspectives are mostly sidelined by the updated, more inclusive tone, making the ideological spectrum fairly one-note.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.