Martha Marcy May Marlene (2011) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Martha Marcy May Marlene2011

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Martha Marcy May Marlene is refreshingly non-woke by current standards. Its narrative respects character and story over ideology, avoids culture war landmines, and remains focused on psychological drama rather than political messaging. A rare, low-woke gem in modern filmmaking.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Martha Marcy May Marlene is driven by psychological tension and character study, not ideology. The film focuses on trauma, cult dynamics, and personal recovery while maintaining character complexity and realism over identity politics. Forced representation or tokenism is not in play.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film uses its cult setting to explore themes of manipulation, vulnerability, and psychological distress, not as a soapbox to undermine faith, family, or masculinity. It treats cultural subjects seriously and doesn’t aggressively subvert traditional roles just for modern political points.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The story sticks to a focused, personal narrative about a survivor of abuse rather than caricaturing dissenting viewpoints. There isn’t open mockery of tradition, and there’s little preaching or uniformity of ideology among its characters, it’s about trauma, not politics.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

The Last 15

22%

15%

15%

13%

13%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.