Maximum Risk (1996) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Maximum Risk1996

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Maximum Risk is a time capsule from the pre-woke era, focused on action over ideology. It’s mercifully free of forced messaging, making it far less woke than most contemporary releases.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Maximum Risk mostly focuses on a standard action-thriller plot featuring Jean-Claude Van Damme in dual roles. There’s little sign of identity politics or characters defined by modern ideology. Characters fit genre archetypes and are cast for purpose, not ideology, making this a rare instance of narrative being king.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t spend time critiquing masculinity, family, or traditional values. Instead, it relies on classic action tropes, tough guys, gritty cops, and basic plotlines. Nothing here feels like a shot at traditional culture. It’s blissfully uninterested in making a statement, which is refreshing by modern standards.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no ideological preaching, nor are alternative worldviews villainized or caricatured. It’s about as open as an action flick from the 90s gets, more interested in fistfights than philosophy. No forced consensus or modern moral monologues in sight.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Once Upon a Time in Mexico

Movie poster for Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within

22%

12%

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.