Microcosmos (1996) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Microcosmos1996

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Microcosmos is about as non-woke as it gets. An apolitical, ideology-free look at nature, packed with awe but blissfully free of forced messaging or cultural revisionism. Just bugs, mud, and some really nice close-ups.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Microcosmos is a documentary about insect life with virtually no human characters or ideological narrative. There's no sign of forced representation or shoehorning of modern identity politics. The story is driven entirely by observing nature, pure and simple.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Given its focus on insects, the film doesn't comment on religion, family, gender roles, or morality in any way. There's certainly no subversion or reinterpretation of cultural traditions; it's just bugs doing their thing.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's no ideological narrative or monoculture to speak of. The film is about bug life without modern ideological commentary or pointed worldview. It's an apolitical slice of nature, plain and simple.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Murder on a Sunday Morning

Movie poster for Sobibor, October 14, 1943, 4 p.m.

Movie poster for In the Land of the Deaf

Movie poster for The 10th District Court: Moments of Trial

Movie poster for Lumumba: Death of a Prophet

Movie poster for Ernesto Che Guevara, the Bolivian Diary

20%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.