Mississippi Burning (1988) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

67%

Mississippi Burning1988

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Mississippi Burning sits in the moderate-to-high range. While addressing vital historical issues, it leans into clear ideological framing and sometimes lacks balanced representation of perspectives, landing it on the higher side of the woke scale for its time.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The film highlights racial themes, focusing primarily on the justice-seeking efforts of the FBI. While character depth is present (especially with the lead agents), the narrative sometimes sidelines the lived experiences and agency of Black characters, arguably oversimplifying complex historical realities for dramatic effect.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Mississippi Burning does critique aspects of southern culture, authority, and religion during the civil rights era, portraying some traditional figures as antagonistic or regressive. However, this matches the real historical context, and doesn't feel gratuitous by modern standards.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Many traditional southern and dissenting perspectives are villainized or depicted with little nuance. There's a clear good-versus-evil presentation, with little room for internal debate or exploration of alternative viewpoints beyond caricatures.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

Movie poster for Dirty Rotten Scoundrels

Movie poster for The Unbearable Lightness of Being

13%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.