Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl (1982) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl1982

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A relic from an earlier, comedy-first age, Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl is refreshingly free of modern ideological preoccupations. Its non-woke, chaotic style lands satire equally on all sides, making it a fun break from the current Hollywood status quo.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl is a product of classic British comedy, where absurdity and satire take center stage. There's little to no emphasis on identity traits over character or humor, and casting clearly favors comedic ability and chemistry over representation.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show is irreverent, but its satire targets all facets of society, including religion and culture, in a tongue-in-cheek fashion, not as a vehicle for modern ideological messaging or subversion of traditional values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

In this concert film, all kinds of viewpoints and institutions are poked fun at. There's no consistent ideological messaging, nor are dissenting perspectives villainized, everyone is fair game, as is typical of Monty Python's style.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Movie poster for How to Get Ahead in Advertising

18%

12%

Movie poster for The Adventures of Baron Munchausen

Movie poster for Richard Pryor: Live on the Sunset Strip

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.