Mystery Train (1989) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

Mystery Train1989

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Mystery Train" is about as non-woke as it gets for late-80s indie cinema. Diverse characters serve the story, not an agenda, and the film resists the typical trappings of modern ideological messaging. Refreshing and grounded.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Some viewers may notice the film blends diverse characters from various backgrounds, but it’s done organically for the story, not shoehorned in. Character depth and cultural clash are explored without heavy-handed identity politics. The plot focuses on authentic human experiences rather than box-checking representation.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film does not undercut traditional values nor does it mock family or faith. Instead, it examines American and foreign perspectives in a laid-back, honest manner. There’s no obvious attempt to rewrite history or lecture about tradition versus progress.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While the narrative features outsiders and subcultures, it doesn’t villainize traditional norms or present a singular, preachy worldview. The story accommodates multiple viewpoints, giving each its own nuance and humanity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

Movie poster for *batteries not included

55%

Movie poster for Billy Connolly: The Pick of Billy Connolly

Movie poster for Bert Visscher: Don Chaôt En De Foute Architect

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.