Naked Gun 33⅓: The Final Insult (1994) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Naked Gun 33⅓: The Final Insult1994

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Naked Gun 33⅓: The Final Insult is gloriously non-woke. Its gags are universal, lacking modern ideological pressure. If you’re allergic to woke storytelling, this film is safe, irreverent territory.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This film is a classic slapstick comedy with little interest in identity politics. Characters are there to serve the jokes, not to check diversity boxes. There's no sense that casting or character arcs are driven by modern ideological concerns. Pure comedic intent rules the day here.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The movie pokes fun at everything, from police work to pop culture, but does not attack traditional values, religion, or masculinity. If anything, it lampoons the foibles of everyone without targeting core cultural foundations. Its style is chaotic, not ideological.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Naked Gun 33⅓ is a product of its time, where irreverence aimed in all directions. There’s no obvious attempt to villainize traditional perspectives or beat viewers over the head with one worldview. Everyone and everything is up for a joke.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear

Movie poster for The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!

12%

16%

Movie poster for All I Want For Christmas

13%

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.