National Lampoon Presents Dorm Daze (2003) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

National Lampoon Presents Dorm Daze2003

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Dorm Daze lands very low on the woke scale. It’s mostly raunchy, immature fun with little interest in ideology or forced representation. If you want a non-woke college romp, this one delivers exactly that (for better or worse).

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Dorm Daze mostly sticks to tried-and-true college comedy formulas, with narrative driven by wild misunderstandings and raunchy antics. There's little sign of characters being included or emphasized primarily for modern identity politics. It’s not deep, but it isn’t sacrificing its story for ideology either.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film relies on crude humor and plays with college stereotypes, but doesn’t target religion, family, or traditional values for derision. It depicts typical college debauchery more for laughs than for any ideological subversion, sticking to humor that would offend equal opportunity.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While there’s no meaningful exploration of alternative viewpoints, any lack of pluralism is more due to a focus on slapstick rather than a push toward ideological uniformity. Alternative or traditional perspectives aren’t really mocked, they’re mostly ignored in favor of silly escapades.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

13%

72%

12%

15%

10%

65%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.