Offside (2006) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

40%

Offside2006

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘Offside’ is far less ‘woke’ than most modern Hollywood offerings, with its cultural critique grounded in real Iranian issues rather than Western ideological fashion. Its focus is social, not identity pandering. Wokesters would probably call it too subtle.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film’s focus is on Iranian women smuggling themselves into a soccer stadium, a real issue in the context of Iran’s strict gender segregation. However, the characters are realistically flawed, and identity isn't forced but central to the story’s conflict. It doesn’t feel like Western-style forced representation or a quota checklist at work.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

‘Offside’ does gently challenge traditional gender roles and Iranian cultural norms, especially the ban on women at sports events. While it questions some cultural practices, it does so through relatable characters, not heavy-handed lectures. However, it definitely pokes at long-standing traditions in a way some viewers may find subversive.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

There is critique of authority and certain cultural traditions, but the film doesn’t go out of its way to demonize all forms of tradition or religion. Some diverse viewpoints from guards and fans add nuance, preventing it from feeling like an ideological echo chamber.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.