Open Range (2003) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Open Range2003

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Open Range is a breath of fresh, non-woke air, a classic Western that honors traditional values, avoids modern identity politics, and delivers story-driven character arcs. Little to no wokeness detected.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Open Range keeps its characters grounded in classic Western archetypes, focusing on personal skill, grit, and morality over forced diversity or modern identity themes. There is no noticeable emphasis on race, gender, or sexuality as a substitute for character development. The narrative remains faithful to the setting and genre.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film reinforces traditional notions of masculinity, honor, and loyalty, respecting family and moral codes typical of the Western genre. The story values strong men and moral dilemmas, without mocking or diminishing these cultural touchstones. Religion and tradition, if mentioned, are treated respectfully or neutrally.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There is little to no indication of ideological monoculture. The film contains some nuanced perspectives on violence and justice, and doesn't villainize or stereotype dissenting views. Characters hold conflicting opinions, giving the story pluralism rather than dogma.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.